4.5 Article

Purification and characterization of an arginine regulatory protein, ArgR, in Corynebacterium glutamicum

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-011-0977-9

关键词

Corynebacterium glutamicum; Arginine biosynthesis genes; Transcriptional regulation; ArgR transcriptional repressor

资金

  1. Sookmyung Women's University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corynebacterium glutamicum, a Gram-positive bacterium, has been widely used for industrial amino acid production. We previously showed that, in C. glutamicum, argCJBDFRGH arginine biosynthesis genes are clustered but independently transcribed from argC and argG promoters, leading to the generation of two transcripts corresponding to argCJBDFR and argGH. In this report, we show the effect of the C. glutamicum ArgR repressor on argC and argG promoters by overexpressing or disrupting the argR gene. Gel filtration assay results indicate that native ArgR is a hexamer of equal subunits with molecular mass of 110 kDa. Protein sequence analysis revealed the presence of an SR'' (Ser(57)-Arg(58)) motif for the DNA binding site at the N-terminal region and the GTIAGDDTV'' motif for arginine binding and its oligomerization at the C-terminal region. An argC or argG promoter-lacZ fusion reporter assay and argR mutational analysis showed that transcription of the argCJBDFR arginine biosynthesis genes is regulated from the argC promoter by ArgR in cooperation with L-arginine in C. glutamicum. This finding was supported by the gel mobility-shift assay showing direct binding of hexameric ArgR to the argC promoter in the presence of L-arginine. Unexpectedly, argGH transcription was not responsive to the level of ArgR repressor and/or arginine. In a further study, a C. glutamicum argR mutant was constructed by disrupting the chromosomal argR gene to manufacture an improved arginine-producing strain. Arginine productivity was increased in the C. glutamicum argR mutant strain under conditions of both limited and excessive arginine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据