4.6 Article

Nutritional assessment and effects of heat processing on digestibility of Chinese sweet potato protein

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
卷 26, 期 1-2, 页码 104-110

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2012.03.008

关键词

Sweet potato; Sweet potato protein; Amino acids; Heat processing; In vitro digestibility; In vivo digestibility; PDCAAS; Trypsin inhibitors; Food analysis; Food composition

资金

  1. earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-11-B-19]
  2. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2010DFA32690]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Public Scientific Research [0032011014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The amino acid composition, in vitro and in vivo digestibility as well as trypsin inhibitor activity (TIA) of sweet potato protein (SPP) were evaluated. The effects of different types of heat processing on the in vitro digestibility and TIA of SPP were also investigated. The results showed that SPP was deficient in lysine, but rich in threonine, valine, tryptophan and aromatic amino acids. SDS-PAGE analysis showed that native SPP was not easily digested by pepsin-pancreatin enzyme system, whereas commercial soy protein isolate (SPI) displayed a good in vitro digestibility. Autoclaving (127 degrees C for 20 min, 0.145 MPa) significantly improved in vitro and in vivo digestibility of SPP. The in vivo digestibility of autoclaved SPP was 95.1%, which was comparable to that of SPI (96.1%) and casein (97.4%), and remarkably higher than that of native SPP (50.4%). PDCAAS of native SPP and autoclaved SPP were 0.36 and 0.66, respectively. In addition, autoclaving also markedly decreased TIA of native SPP from 67.8 to 2.0 mg trypsin/g protein. Autoclaving enhanced in vitro digestibility and decreased TIA of native SPP, thereby improving its food qualities. Although SPP was deficient in lysine, autoclaved SPP could be utilized as a good protein source for human consumption. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据