4.6 Article

Fungal endophyte infection of ryegrass reprograms host metabolism and alters development

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 208, 期 4, 页码 1227-1240

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13614

关键词

endophyte; metabolism; mutualism; RNAseq; ryegrass; symbiosis

资金

  1. Bio-Protection Research Centre
  2. Massey University
  3. Royal Society of New Zealand Rutherford Fellowship [RDF-10-MAU-001]
  4. Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund grant [MAU-14-03, MAU-13-02]
  5. Australian Research Council [FT110100698]
  6. AgResearch
  7. Australian Research Council [FT110100698] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Beneficial associations between plants and microbes play an important role in both natural and agricultural ecosystems. For example, associations between fungi of the genus Epichloe, and cool-season grasses are known for their ability to increase resistance to insect pests, fungal pathogens and drought. However, little is known about the molecular changes induced by endophyte infection. To study the impact of endophyte infection, we compared the expression profiles, based on RNA sequencing, of perennial ryegrass infected with Epichloe festucae with noninfected plants. We show that infection causes dramatic changes in the expression of over one third of host genes. This is in stark contrast to mycorrhizal associations, where substantially fewer changes in host gene expression are observed, and is more similar to pathogenic interactions. We reveal that endophyte infection triggers reprogramming of host metabolism, favouring secondary metabolism at a cost to primary metabolism. Infection also induces changes in host development, particularly trichome formation and cell wall biogenesis. Importantly, this work sheds light on the mechanisms underlying enhanced resistance to drought and super-infection by fungal pathogens provided by fungal endophyte infection. Finally, our study reveals that not all beneficial plant-microbe associations behave the same in terms of their effects on the host.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据