4.5 Article

Rapid detection of sepsis in rats through volatile organic compounds in breath

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.12.001

关键词

Sepsis; Volatile organic compounds; Ion mobility spectrometer; Rat model; Bedside patient systems; Non-invasive detection

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [SAF2008-02991, PI081908]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Sepsis Sepsis is one of the main causes of death in adult intensive care units. The major drawbacks of the different methods used for its diagnosis and monitoring are their inability to provide fast responses and unsuitability for bedside use. In this study, performed using a rat sepsis model, we evaluate breath analysis with Ion Mobility Spectrometry (IMS) as a fast, portable and non-invasive strategy. Methods: This study was carried out on 20 Sprague-Dawley rats. Ten rats were injected with lipopolysaccharide from Escherichia colt and ten rats were IP injected with regular saline. After a 24-h period, the rats were anaesthetized and their exhaled breaths were collected and measured with IMS and SPME-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (SPME-GC/MS) and the data were analyzed with multivariate data processing techniques. Results: The SPME-GC/MS dataset processing showed 92% accuracy in the discrimination between the two groups, with a confidence interval of between 90.9% and 92.9%. Percentages for sensitivity and specificity were 98% (97.5-98.5%) and 85% (84.6-87.6%), respectively. The IMS database processing generated an accuracy of 99.8% (99.7-99.9%), a specificity of 99.6% (99.5-99.7%) and a sensitivity of 99.9% (99.8-100%). Conclusions: IMS involving fast analysis times, minimum sample handling and portable instrumentation can be an alternative for continuous bedside monitoring. IMS spectra require data processing with proper statistical models for the technique to be used as an alternative to other methods. These animal model results suggest that exhaled breath can be used as a point-of-care tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of sepsis. (C) 2011 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据