4.5 Article

Screening of lactic acid bacteria potentially useful for sorghum fermentation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 9-15

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2010.02.011

关键词

Sorghum; Fermentation; Lactic acid bacteria

资金

  1. FCT (Portugal) [SFRH/BD/19525/2004]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/19525/2004] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A screening of commercial lactic acid bacteria potentially useful in the improvement of sorghum nutritional quality was done. The aim of this study was to test starter cultures to meet the prerequisites for the establishment of small-scale industrial production of sorghum fermented foods in Africa. Sorghum was fermented with commercial strains of Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus fermentum, Pediococcus pentosaceus and Streptococcus thermophilus. As a result of sorghum prolamins hydrolysis, an increase in the in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD) was promoted. After pepsin digestion, changes occurred in the electrophoretic profile of prolamins, with a decrease of almost all fermented sample spots in comparison with the unfermented sample. Samples in which the decrease of 45 kDa and 66 kDa oligomers was more pronounced, presented higher IVPD. Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy in tandem with multivariate analysis showed starch structural changes in samples fermented with Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus fermentum, Streptococcus thermophilus and Pediococcus pentosaceus. This work demonstrates that all tested bacteria promoted beneficial effects on sorghum nutritional quality and are suitable to be used as commercial starters for industrial applications. Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacillus fermentum are the most promising starters as they lead to higher IVPD values (46.48, 39.19 and 36.73%, respectively). (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据