4.6 Article

Structural Characterization of Human Cytochrome P450 2C19 ACTIVE SITE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN P450s 2C8, 2C9, AND 2C19

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 287, 期 53, 页码 44581-44591

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.424895

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health from NIGMS [R01GM031001]
  2. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  3. National Institute of Health from NIGMS [P41GM103393]
  4. National Institutes of Health from NCRR [P41RR001209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To identify the structural features underlying the distinct substrate and inhibitor profiles of P450 2C19 relative to the closely related human enzymes, P450s 2C8 and 2C9, the atomic structure (Protein Data Bank code 4GQS) of cytochrome P450 2C19 complexed with the inhibitor (2-methyl-1-benzo furan-3-yl)-(4-hydroxy- 3,5-dimethylphenyl) methanone (Protein Data Bank chemical component 0XV) was determined to 2.87 angstrom resolution by x-ray crystallography. The conformation of the peptide back-bone of P450 2C19 is most similar to that of P450 2C8, but the substrate-binding cavity of P450 2C8 is much larger than that of P450 2C19 due to differences in the amino acid residues that form the substrate-binding cavities of the two enzymes. In contrast, the substrate-binding cavity of P450 2C19 is much more similar in size to that of the structure of the P450 2C9 flurbiprofen complex than to that of a modified P450 2C9 or that of P450 2C8. The cavities of the P450 2C19 0XV complex and the P450 2C9 flurbiprofen complex differ, however, because the helix B-C loops of the two enzymes are dissimilar. These conformational differences reflect the effects of adjacent structural elements that interact with the B-C loops and that differ between the two enzymes. The availability of a structure for 2C19 will facilitate computational approaches for predictions of substrate and inhibitor binding to this enzyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据