4.5 Article

Effects of interannual variations in environmental conditions on seasonal range selection by Mongolian gazelles

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 61-68

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.12.008

关键词

Drylands; Long-distance movement; Migration; MODIS; NDVI; Satellite tracking

资金

  1. Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology [14405039, 18255002, 20255001]
  2. 21st Century COE (Centers of Excellence) Program
  3. Global COE program
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20255001, 24510326, 18255002, 14405039] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To examine the effects of interannual variations in environmental conditions on the seasonal range selection and movement pattern of Mongolian gazelles Procapra gutturosa, we compared the summer and winter ranges of satellite tracked gazelles among 3 years, and we analyzed the environmental conditions in the gazelles' seasonal ranges by using a satellite-derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). The movement pattern of the tracked Mongolian gazelles was not regular migration between specific seasonal ranges. The locations of the summer ranges in 2003 and 2004 were similar for all gazelles, but in 2005, when the NDVI values were lower, the animals ranged about 30-70 km farther north, suggesting that the gazelles used areas of similar vegetation availability with former 2 years. The winter ranges were widely separated among years; the longest distance between winter ranges of the same individual in different years was about 340 km. During winter, the NDVI values of the winter ranges of tracked gazelles were almost always higher than or not significantly different from the mean of the 3-year range. Conservation strategies to allow access to wide ranges containing suitable areas in each year for gazelles, which location is changing interannually, are important. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据