4.5 Article

Fuel and fire behavior analysis for early-season prescribed fire planning in Sudanian and Sahelian savannas

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 84-93

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.09.007

关键词

Combustion completeness; Fuel moisture content; Nomographs; Prescribed burns; Senegal

资金

  1. West African Network for Studies of Environmental Change (Wansec)/DANIDA
  2. French Cooperation (French Embassy in Senegal)
  3. International Foundation for Science (IFS)
  4. Senegalese Government via the FIRST program (Fonds d'Impulsion pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Early dry-season prescribed fires can reduce fuel loads and thus prevent or mitigate the severity of late, high-intensity fires that spread widely in savanna ecosystems and damage woody plants. However, due to the lack of scientific knowledge regarding fuel characteristics and fire behavior in West African savannas, this practice can have effects that are diametrically opposed to those desired and may threaten the environment. There are three crucial parameters that must be considered when planning early-season prescribed fires: the ignition probability, the rate of spread of a fire and the amount of fuel consumed. In this study, 231 early-season prescribed fires were conducted in three savanna ecosystems in Senegal in order to characterize these three fundamental parameters. Logistic regression analyses revealed that fuel moisture content and relative humidity are good predictors of ignition probability. Multiple linear regressions were used to investigate the relationships between fire rate of spread, fuel consumption or fire intensity and fuel and weather conditions. Readily usable nomographs for forest managers were created based on those relationships that proved to be significant. Kruskal Wallis tests performed to compare the observed rates of fire propagation with those predicted using BehavePlus showed no statistically significant difference between them. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据