4.5 Article

Dieback affects forest structure in a dry Afromontane forest in northern Ethiopia

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
卷 75, 期 5, 页码 499-503

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.12.013

关键词

Dead standing stem; Elevation gradient; Juniperus procera; Olen europaea subsp cuspidata; Restoration; Semiarid

资金

  1. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forests are highly susceptible to dieback under ongoing climate warming. In degraded forests, dead standing trees, or snags, have become such prominent features that they should be taken into account when setting management interventions. This study investigated (1) the extent and spatial pattern of standing dead stems of Juniperus procera and Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata along an elevational gradient, and (2) the effect of dieback on forest stand structure. We quantified abundance, size, and spatial pattern of tree dieback in 57 plots (50 m x 50 m) established at 100 m intervals along five transects. The snag density and basal area (mean +/- SE) of the two species combined were 147 +/- 23 stems ha(-1) and 5.35 +/- 0.81 m(2) ha(-1), respectively. The percentages of snags were extremely high for both J. procera (57 +/- 7%) and O. europaea subsp. cuspidata (60 +/- 5%), but showed a decreasing trend with increasing elevation suggesting that restoration is even more urgent at the lower elevations. Snags of the two species accounted for 31 and 45% of total stand density and basal area, respectively. Living stems exhibited truncated inverse-J-shaped diameter and height class distributions, indicating serious regeneration problems of these foundation species in the study area. In addition to direct interventions to assist recruitment of climax tree species, sites with high dieback would probably benefit from snag reduction to prevent fire incidents in the remaining dry Afromontane forests in northern Ethiopia. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据