4.5 Article

Changes in ecosystem carbon stocks following grassland afforestation of semiarid sandy soil in the southeastern Keerqin Sandy Lands, China

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
卷 72, 期 12, 页码 2193-2200

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.07.007

关键词

Carbon sequestration; Land-cover change; Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica; Populus simonii

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2007CB106803]
  2. National Key Technologies R&D Program of China [2006BAD26B0201-1, 2006BAC01A12]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30471377]
  4. Key Lab Foundation of Liaoning Province [07ZDS111S1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ecological consequences of grassland afforestation in arid/semiarid sandy regions are not well known with respect to tree species and stand age. The present Study quantifies the changes in above- and belowground carbon (C) stocks following afforestation in the southeastern Keerqin Sandy Lands with species of Mongolian pine and poplar. We Studied 15-, 24-, and 30-year-old Mongolian pine plantations, 7-, 11-, and 15-year-old poplar plantations, and adjacent grasslands. The results show that total ecosystem C stocks increased following grassland afforestation. Aboveground C stocks increased at a rate of 2.75 Mg C ha(-1) yr(-1) in the poplar plantations, and 1.06 Mg C ha(-1) yr(-1) in the Mongolian pine plantations. Mineral soil C stocks decreased during the early stage of forest establishment, but recovered with increasing stand age. Root C stock increased significantly in the Mongolian pine plantations, but the poplar plantations showed no such increase relative to the grassland. Our results indicate that afforestation of the grassland in the Southeastern Keerqin Sandy Lands would sequester more C than would continuous grassland. Tree species selection and stand developmental age should be considered in planning future afforestation projects. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据