4.7 Article

Enhancement of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in Nham (Thai fermented pork sausage) using starter cultures of Lactobacillus namurensis NH2 and Pediococcus pentosaceus HN8

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 167, 期 2, 页码 170-176

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.09.014

关键词

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA); Fermented meats; Lactic acid bacteria; Monosodium glutamate; Response surface methodology; Starter cultures

资金

  1. Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission [SCI540557a]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim was to produce Nham that was enriched with gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA); therefore two GABA producing lactic acid bacteria (Pediococcus pentosaceus HN8 and Lactobacillus namurensis NH2) were used as starter cultures. By using the central composite design (CCD) we showed that addition of 0.5% monosodium glutamate (MSG) together with an inoculum size of roughly 6 log CFU/g of each of the two strains produced a maximal amounts of GABA (4051 mg/kg) in the 'GABA Nham' product. This was higher than any current popular commercial Nham product by roughly 8 times. 'GABA Nham' with the additions of both starters and MSG (T-SM) supported maximum populations of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with a minimum of yeasts and no staphylococci or molds when compared to the controls that had no addition of any starters or MSG (T-NN), or only the addition of MSG (T-NM), or with only the starter (T-SN). Based on proximate analysis among the Nham sets, 'GABA Nham' was low in fat, carbohydrate and energy although its texture and color were slightly different from the control (T-NN). However, sensory evaluations of 'GABA Nham' were more acceptable than the controls and commercial Nham products for all tested parameters. Hence, a unique novel 'GABA Nham' fermented pork sausage was successfully developed. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据