4.7 Article

Effect of Equisetum arvense and Stevia rebaudiana extracts on growth and mycotoxin production by Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides in maize seeds as affected by water activity

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 153, 期 1-2, 页码 21-27

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.10.010

关键词

Equisetum arvense; Stevia rebaudiana; Mycotoxins; Aspergillus flavus; Fusarium verticillioides; Maize

资金

  1. Spanish government [AGL2010-22182-C04-04]
  2. Comissionat per a Universitats i Recerca d'Innovacio
  3. Universitats I Empresa de la Generalitat de Catalunya (AGAUR)
  4. European Social Fund
  5. European Union [MYCORED KBBE-2007-2-5-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cereals are a very important part of the human and animal diets. However, agricultural products can be contaminated by moulds and their mycotoxins. Plant extracts, particularly those of Equisetum arvense and Stevia rebaudiana have been reported previously to contain antioxidant compounds which may have antifungal properties. In this study, E. arvense and S. rebaudiana extracts were tested for their control of mycotoxigenic fungi in maize. The extracts were tested separately and as a mixture for their effect on growth of Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides. Extracts were added to unsterilised inoculated maize at different water activity (a(w)) levels (0.85-0.95). Moulds were inoculated and incubated for 30 days. Results confirmed that the extract of E. arvense and a mixture 1:1 of Equisetum-Stevia may be effective for the inhibition of both growth of A.flavus and aflatoxin production at high water activity levels (pre-harvest conditions). In general, growth of the F. verticillioides was reduced by the use of plant extracts, especially at 0.95 a(w). However, fumonisin presence was not significantly affected. E. arvense and S. rebaudiana extracts could be developed as an alternative treatment to control aflatoxigenic mycobiota in moist maize. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据