4.6 Article

Exposure to household air pollution from biomass cookstoves and blood pressure among women in rural Honduras: A cross-sectional study

期刊

INDOOR AIR
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 130-142

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ina.12507

关键词

biomass; blood pressure; cookstoves; global health; household air pollution; Latin America

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [ES022810]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH [T42OH009229] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P30DK092926] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growing evidence links household air pollution exposure from biomass cookstoves with elevated blood pressure. We assessed cross-sectional associations of 24-hour mean concentrations of personal and kitchen fine particulate matter (PM2.5), black carbon (BC), and stove type with blood pressure, adjusting for confounders, among 147 women using traditional or cleaner-burning Justa stoves in Honduras. We investigated effect modification by age and body mass index. Traditional stove users had mean (standard deviation) personal and kitchen 24-hour PM2.5 concentrations of 126 mu g/m(3) (77) and 360 mu g/m(3) (374), while Justa stove users' exposures were 66 mu g/m(3) (38) and 137 mu g/m(3) (194), respectively. BC concentrations were similarly lower among Justa stove users. Adjusted mean systolic blood pressure was 2.5 mm Hg higher (95% CI, 0.7-4.3) per unit increase in natural log-transformed kitchen PM2.5 concentration; results were stronger among women of 40 years or older (5.2 mm Hg increase, 95% CI, 2.3-8.1). Adjusted odds of borderline high and high blood pressure (categorized) were also elevated (odds ratio = 1.5, 95% CI, 1.0-2.3). Some results included null values and are suggestive. Results suggest that reduced household air pollution, even when concentrations exceed air quality guidelines, may help lower cardiovascular disease risk, particularly among older subgroups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据