4.3 Article

Negative-/Positive-Bias-Instability Analysis of the Memory Characteristics Improved by Hydrogen Postannealing in MANOS Capacitors

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TDMR.2009.2036248

关键词

Flash memory; metal-alumina-nitride-oxide-silicon (MANOS); negative-bias (NB) temperature instabilities (NBTIs); passivation effect; positive-bias (PB) temperature instabilities (PBTIs); postannealing

资金

  1. Korean Government under the National Research Foundation (NRF) [K20901000002-09E0100-00210]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Quantum Photonic Science Research Center)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-00454] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the effect of hydrogen annealing on the gate-leakage-current and switching characteristics of metal-alumina-nitride-oxide-silicon (MANOS) capacitors by analyzing their negative-/positive-bias instability (NBI/PBI). One sample, namely, A, is annealed with rapid thermal annealing (RTA), and the other sample, namely, B, is first annealed with RTA and then further annealed in a furnace, using a N-2-H-2 (98% nitrogen and 2% hydrogen) gas mixture. In the NBI/PBI experiments, the flatband voltage shift Delta V-FB is observed to be smaller, i.e., the gate-leakage-current density is reduced for sample B at gate voltages less than +/- 3 V, a domain where trap-assisted tunneling is dominant. However, Delta V-FB increases rapidly for the same sample at gate voltages larger than +/- 6 V, a domain where the modified Fowler-Nordheim tunneling (MFNT) is dominant, which indicates faster program-and-erase characteristics. These results show that additional hydrogen annealing can improve both device reliability and switching characteristics of the MANOS-type memory by reducing interface traps between the silicon substrate and silicon oxide layers, as well as turn-on voltages for MFNT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据