认证评论 - Nanoscale
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

zhgong007 2023-08-09

It has been almost a month. Haven't you reminded me yet?

屁屁乐 2023-08-08

It's indeed too slow. Submitted on July 10th and it's still "with editor" now.

llseu 2023-08-05

2023.08.05 in peer review translates to "August 5, 2023 in the process of being reviewed by peers."

llseu 2023-08-02

2023.08.02 with editor translates to "August 2, 2023 with editor" in English.

llseu 2023-08-02

2023.07.19 submit - Submitted on July 19, 2023
2023.07.19 with editor - Under review with the editor on July 19, 2023
2023.0727 in peer review - In peer review since July 27, 2023

zhgong007 2023-07-31

So slow, it's been 18 days and still with the editor. It's not like it's Nature or Science, it's ridiculous how slow this second-tier journal's pre-review process is.

bacca 2023-07-14

It has been 6 weeks and there is still no news, anxiously waiting.

Vilum 2023-06-28

Just published, the impact factor has plummeted.

304 2023-06-22

This real-time impact factor is a bit dangerous, huh? How is it only 6.0? This...

Charming666 2023-06-22

06.08 submitted
Until 06.22 continuously with editor
It feels like it's been stuck for a while, not sure what the situation will be like later.

bacca 2023-06-19

Same question, how can we know when the document is finished being reviewed?

bacca 2023-06-19

Same anticipation, it has been 17 days since submission for review.

outman 2023-06-05

2023-03-08 Submission
2023-03-20 In Review
2023-04-11 Major Revisions Please revise as soon as possible, received two reminder emails.
2023-05-20 Revised
2023-06-01 Accepted

Fightinger 2023-05-25

The child wants to graduate T.T. It's been almost a month in peer review, but there's still no response or tracking. I'm really anxious and hoping for a good outcome soon. [Please, please]

明月相伴清风随行 2023-05-17

2023.2.25 submitted
2023.4.10 major revision
2023.5.11 accepted
In commemoration of this.

student98 2023-05-10

2022.12.8 submitted
2022.12.10 with editor
2023.1.20 in peer review, it has been with editor before this
2023.2.24 with editor
2023.3.11 in peer review
There were 3-4 changes between these two states
2023.3.21 sent an email to urge for review comments, editor replied saying that a new reviewer was found because the first reviewer was taking too long to provide comments
2023.3.23 major revision with 18 comments from two reviewers
2023.4.10 a revision has been submitted
2023.4.20 accepted, one reviewer replied stating that the revised version meets the publication requirements
2023.5.10 online
It took nearly 4 months to receive the first review comments in the early stage, but good things take time.

考拉上树 2023-05-10

3.23 submitted
4.5 in peer review
5.7 minor revision
The reviewers are all very friendly, and the editor is also very nice. I hope to return to the first-tier category.

hua` 2023-05-04

Hello, may I ask how long it took for you to receive the first-round review comments from the submission?

houbier 2023-04-03

"This paper has a well-structured argument, which greatly enhances its readability. It appears to be a well-crafted paper that only requires minor revisions for publication. However, after carefully reading it four times, I believe that the paper lacks sufficient depth and cannot be published in Nanoscale. I apologize for saying this, but this work does not meet the expected standards for publication in Nanoscale, which is known for its strict requirements as a top-tier journal. Perhaps RSC Advances would be more appropriate."

maicao 2023-04-03

20230403 In the process of reviewing, hoping to graduate, bless me for a smooth journey.

屁屁乐 2023-04-01

Did you submit it for review?

屁屁乐 2023-04-01

It has been two weeks, why is there no progress with the editor?

Vilum 2023-03-19

Jumping back and forth between "with editor" and "in peer review" is quite unsettling.

maicao 2023-03-16

I didn't see the switch, I guess it wasn't there when I was looking.

student98 2023-03-16

Hello, I would like to ask, have the system status of yours not switched between "with editor" and "in peer review" in the past two months?

student98 2023-03-16

Brother, has the system status not been switching between "with editor" and "in peer review" for the past two months?

杜杜 2023-03-15

No news for two months after submitting, but suddenly got hired today without any modifications. So impressive!

maicao 2023-03-08

20230308 Submit for review. Hoping for good luck and hoping for a smooth graduation.

maicao 2023-03-07

2023.2.26 Submission Initial Evaluation; 20230228 with editor; 20230307 In the hands of the editor, approximately nine days have passed. Based on the information found through search, the longest rejection time is 12-14 days, but the longest review time is also 9-10 days, so the outcome is still unknown. Hoping for no rejection.

夜行侠 2023-03-06

It has been a week with the editor, I don't know if it can be reviewed or not.

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More