西部科研小虫 2023-05-28

I have already submitted my article a week ago, but it has not been assigned to an editor yet. I don't know if you have assigned it or not.

思君 2023-04-19

How is the current situation? I also submitted my contribution, but it has not been assigned an editor yet. What's the situation? Thank you!

让我发个大子刊吧 2023-04-15

It has been half a month since I submitted, and the editing has not been assigned yet. Is it really that slow, everyone?

专注投稿 2023-03-27

Generally, it would take at least six months, with the fastest being around five months. I submitted my contribution about six months ago. The editor is very responsible, and the reviewers are very professional with a strong sense of timeliness. You can submit your work to this journal, as I have high expectations for it.

专注投稿 2023-03-27

Unexpectedly fast, perhaps the direction is relatively innovative. Several reviewers have given positive evaluations, and it ended in just one round. The first round of review took about one and a half months, and the second round was accepted directly. It is possible to submit to this journal. Overall, it is very fast.

专注投稿 2023-03-27

Research direction, battery, electrode material being developed, it took approximately six months from submission to acceptance, with a slight delay due to the outbreak of the pandemic. Otherwise, it could have been even faster. Overall, the process felt quite fast. Currently, this journal holds high expectations, and its influence is expected to further increase.

专注投稿 2023-03-27

The efficiency is quite high, with a relatively short first review period and a slightly longer second review time. The overall market is 7 months, so you can give it a try. It's a good nature sub-journal.

专注投稿 2023-03-27

The review period is 10 days after submission. The feedback from the first review took 46 days. After making revisions, it was returned, and the second review took 25 days. The third review took 10 days to return. Overall, it feels very fast. Our group and the neighboring research group have already received two articles. It seems that this journal has a high efficiency.

专注投稿 2023-03-27

The submission deadline is the 7th day after submission. The feedback for the first review takes 45 days. After making the necessary revisions, it is resubmitted and the second review takes 30 days. The third review results in direct acceptance. Overall, it feels very fast, with high editing efficiency. The journal actively contacts the authors of the submissions. Currently, this journal is highly regarded and its influence will continue to increase.

专注投稿 2023-03-27

Maybe it's just our luck, but the article I submitted didn't get rejected by top experts, and the review process was quite fast. Compared to other Nature journals, it's safe to say it was almost the same. The editors were quite responsible and responded to emails promptly. In the case you mentioned, we can only attribute it to bad luck.

专注投稿 2023-03-27

Our neighboring research group recently received an article which went through a 5-month process from submission to acceptance. Each round of peer review took approximately a little over a month, and the initial submission was reviewed in about a week. The timeliness is quite good. Our boss also likes this journal a lot and plans to submit an article this year. We hope for good luck.

专注投稿 2023-03-27

Our group submitted to this journal about 6 months ago, and so far they have accepted two articles. After each revision, it takes about 1-2 months for the editor to review. Overall, the review process feels strict, but the efficiency is good. The editors are also very responsible, much faster than other sub-journals of Nature.

专注投稿 2023-03-27

Now it's already quite fast, your situation belongs to a special case.

专注投稿 2023-03-27

As of now, this journal has seen a significant improvement in the speed of peer review. Originally, it was quite slow, but now the average acceptance time is within 6 months. The journal editors are also very responsible. We have submitted several articles as a group, and all of them have been accepted. Each round of peer review usually takes about 1-2 months. Overall, it feels very similar to other Nature journals.

kbo 2023-01-27

The overall acceptance rate is less than 3%, and the acceptance rate after submission is approximately 18.2%.

kbo 2023-01-18

The manuscript number is huge, and I am surprised to see so many people supporting Nat Sus, and the speed is very slow.

Xxxxxppppp 2022-12-20

I also submitted articles on remote sensing and would like to ask how to increase the chances of being accepted.

仙人指路 2022-08-22

Isn't it a double-blind review? Do we still need to seek the opinion of an expert?

仙人指路 2022-08-22

Isn't it a double-blind review?

123t 2022-07-18

What is the result behind? Has it been submitted and received?

choose 2022-03-30

Experience is precious! I wish for your article to be published smoothly and successfully!

SJN-UESTC 2022-03-22

Did you receive it in the end? How long does it take to get the review back?

清真黄焖鸡 2022-03-20

It took more than a month from submission to review, and the processing speed was extremely slow. Please handle with caution.

qq572020211 2021-10-21

Is it really this slow? Don't scare me, I have been waiting for a long time already.

鱼牙牙 2021-05-13

When the journal was first launched, it was relatively easy to submit articles, and many articles with unclear innovative points were also published in the journal. However, in the past half year, its reputation has risen rapidly, and it has become more competitive. This time, when I submitted my article, it remained "under consideration" in the system for a month. In the end, it was rejected without being sent for review. The whole process took 32 days.