友情提示：以下期刊信息可能会有更新，仅供参考，请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review
MINER PROCESS EXTR M
ISSN / eISSN
0882-7508 / 1547-7401
目标和范围
Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review publishes both theoretical and practical papers relevant to technical, economic, and environmental issues in the handling, processing, and utilization of minerals. In addition to regular issues, special issues focusing on subjects of regional and topical significance will be published when the Editor feels there is sufficient interest among readers.
研究方向
冶金工程
矿业与矿物加工
CiteScore
8.20
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
| 类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences - Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology | Q1 | #22/211 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences - Mechanical Engineering | Q1 | #68/631 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences - Economic Geology | Q1 | #7/40 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences - General Chemistry | Q1 | #67/407 |
Web of Science 核心合集
| Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
|---|---|
| Indexed | - |
| 类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | 分区 |
|---|---|
| METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING - SCIE | Q1 |
| MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING - SCIE | Q1 |
H-index
29
出版国家或地区
UNITED STATES
出版商
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
出版周期
Quarterly
年文章数
63
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 325 CHESTNUT ST, SUITE 800, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA, 19106
认证评论
2022-05-05 reject and resubmit (both reviewers provided positive feedback, but a decision was made to reject and resubmit due to the following reasons)
2022-05-16 resubmit
2022-05-17 reject and resubmit (the editor directly provided the decision: good paper but poor image quality, unclear keywords, and suggested removing most of the images)
2022-05-20 resubmit
2022-05-22 reject (reason: images have high pixel density, exceeding the requirements; it is advised to carefully check before each submission in the future)
Speechless, this journal rejected it solely because of high image resolution, despite receiving positive feedback from the reviewers.
2022.10.3 Rejected (5 reviewers, one of whom gave a rejection)
I am not satisfied and feel that the reviewers did not read my article carefully and rejected it.
2022.10.11 After a thorough revision, resubmitted
2022.10.31 Major revise (2 reviewers, constructive comments)
2022.11.21 Revised submitted (another extensive revision)
2022.11.22 Accepted
Overall, it was a roller coaster ride. The acceptance rate for this journal is only 14%. I feel proud to have been accepted. I would like to express my special thanks to the editor for providing a second chance for review and to all 7 reviewers for their constructive and insightful comments.
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now