友情提示:以下期刊信息可能会有更新,仅供参考,请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
PLANT BIOTECHNOL J
ISSN / eISSN
1467-7644 / 1467-7652
目标和范围
Plant Biotechnology Journal aims to publish high-impact original research and incisive reviews by leading researchers in applied plant science, with an emphasis on molecular plant sciences and their applications through plant biotechnology. We aim to provide a forum for the most important advances in this field, including curiosity-driven studies with the potential for application, strategic research in plant biotechnology, scientific analysis of key issues for the beneficial application of plant sciences and scientific analysis of the performance of the products of plant biotechnology in practice.
研究方向
生物工程与应用微生物
植物科学
CiteScore
19.20
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences - Agronomy and Crop Science | Q1 | #1/376 |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences - Plant Science | Q1 | #6/487 |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences - Biotechnology | Q1 | #13/299 |
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | 分区 |
---|---|
BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY - SCIE | Q1 |
PLANT SCIENCES - SCIE | Q1 |
H-index
96
出版国家或地区
ENGLAND
出版商
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd
出版周期
Monthly
出版年份
2003
年文章数
181
Open Access
YES
通讯方式
WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC, COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN, USA, MA, 02148
认证评论
In the first submission, it was directly rejected after review, but encouraged to resubmit. The experimental suggestions from two reviewers were included and the structure was optimized.
In the second submission, it was stated on the journal's homepage that it would be sent to the same reviewers, but possibly due to the editor's concerns about the additional experimental data from the first submission, it was sent to two different reviewers. One was positive and the other was negative. The editor rejected it again but encouraged resubmission.
The suggestions from the previous reviewer were quite logical and provided many references and experimental methods for reference. Therefore, many revisions were made in the third submission, and ultimately it was accepted with minor revisions.
Overall, the experience of submitting to this journal was quite frustrating, but some of the questions raised by the reviewers were indeed valid. Each time of resubmission, the editor also provided some suggestions for revisions. Perhaps this journal requires a very specific direction for better chances of acceptance.
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started