4.3 Review

Management of haemophilic pseudotumours with special emphasis on radiotherapy and arterial embolization

期刊

HAEMOPHILIA
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 448-457

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01942.x

关键词

arterial embolization; haemophilia; management; pseudotumour; radiotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The haemophilic pseudotumour is an expanding destructive haematoma, which is associated with a considerable amount of morbidity in haemophilic patients. Its prevention is paramount. In fact, this goal can be achieved by primary prophylaxis to avoid muscle haematomas and by adequate and long-term haematological treatment of muscle haematomas in case they appear. At the moment, surgical excision of pseudotumour is the preferred treatment by many authors. However, there are instances that surgical extraction of the lesion is not feasible. In such situations, radiotherapy and arterial embolization should be considered either alone or as an adjunct to surgery. Conservative management using a combination of radiotherapy and replacement therapy should be considered for treating haemophilic bone pseudotumours, which are located in the skull or in the distal parts of the limbs, especially in conditions where some impediments to surgical excision exist. In fact, the radiation should be delivered to the lesion site in small fragments of 2 Gy or less to a total dosage of 6-23.5 Gy, which is the most recommended radiation dosage, at the moment. Therapeutic arterial embolization of haemophilic pseudotumours should be considered in lesions of large size, especially in pseudotumours of pelvic region, as it may effectively reduce its size and decrease the risk of bleeding complications during surgery. Nevertheless, in view of its temporary effect, embolization may better be performed, as a preparatory procedure, at best about 2 weeks prior to surgery. This time lapse will allow for mass shrinkage but is insufficient for vessel restoration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据