4.4 Article

The gene signature in CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein α dysfunctional acute myeloid leukemia predicts responsiveness to histone deacetylase inhibitors

期刊

HAEMATOLOGICA
卷 99, 期 4, 页码 697-705

出版社

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2013.093278

关键词

-

资金

  1. MSMT Navrat grant [LK21307, LK11213]
  2. NIH [CA66996, CA118316]
  3. Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council under its Singapore Translational Research (STaR) Investigator Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

C/EPB alpha proteins, encoded by the CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein a gene, play a crucial role in granulocytic development, and defects in this transcription factor have been reported in acute myeloid leukemia. Here, we defined the C/EPB alpha signature characterized by a set of genes up-regulated upon C/EPB alpha activation. We analyzed expression of the C/EPB alpha signature in a cohort of 525 patients with acute myeloid leukemia and identified a subset characterized by low expression of this signature. We referred to this group of patients as the C/EPB alpha dysfunctional subset. Remarkably, a large percentage of samples harboring C/EPB alpha biallelic mutations clustered within this subset. We hypothesize that re-activation of the C/EPB alpha signature in the C/EPB alpha dysfunctional subset could have therapeutic potential. In search for small molecules able to reverse the low expression of the C/EPB alpha signature we applied the connectivity map. This analysis predicted positive connectivity between the C/EPB alpha activation signature and histone deacetylase inhibitors. We showed that these inhibitors reactivate expression of the C/EPB alpha signature and promote granulocytic differentiation of primary samples from the C/EPB alpha dysfunctional subset harboring biallelic C/EPB alpha mutations. Altogether, our study identifies histone deacetylase inhibitors as potential candidates for the treatment of certain leukemias characterized by down-regulation of the C/EPB alpha signature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据