4.4 Article

Platelet factor 4 induces cell apoptosis by inhibition of STAT3 via up-regulation of SOCS3 expression in multiple myeloma

期刊

HAEMATOLOGICA
卷 98, 期 2, 页码 288-295

出版社

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2012.065607

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC/RGC
  2. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong
  3. National Science Foundation of China [N-CUHK 431/07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is an angiostatic chemokine that suppresses tumor growth and metastasis. We previously revealed frequent transcriptional silencing of PF4 in multiple myeloma, but the functional roles of this chemokine are still unknown. We studied the apoptotic effects of PF4 on myeloma cell lines and primary myeloma in vitro, and investigated the involved signaling pathway. The in vivo effects were also studied using a mouse model. PF4 not only suppressed myeloma-associated angiogenesis, but also inhibited growth and induced apoptosis in myeloma cells. We found that PF4 negatively regulated STAT3 and concordantly inhibited constitutive and interleukin-6-induced phosphorylation of STAT3, and down-regulated the expression of STAT3 target genes (Mcl-1, survivin and VEGF). Overexpression of constitutively activated STAT3 could rescue PF4-induced apoptotic effects. Furthermore, we found that PF4 induced the expression of SOCS3, a STAT3 inhibitor, and gene silencing of SOCS3 abolished its ability to inhibit STAT3 activation, suggesting a critical role of SOCS3 in PF4-induced STAT3 inhibition. Knockdown of LRP1, a putative PF4 receptor, could also abolish PF4-induced apoptosis and STAT3 inhibition. Finally, the tumor growth inhibitory effect of PF4 was confirmed by in vivo mouse models. Immunostaining of rabbit bone xenografts from PF4-treated mice showed induction of apoptosis of myeloma cells and inhibition of angiogenesis, which was associated with suppression of STAT3 activity. Together, our preclinical data indicate that PF4 may be a potential new targeting agent for the treatment of myeloma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据