4.4 Article

Treatment of severe aplastic anemia with a combination of horse antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine, with or without sirolimus: a prospective randomized study

期刊

HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 94, 期 3, 页码 348-354

出版社

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.13829

关键词

aplastic anemia; antithymocyte globulin; cyclosporine; sirolimus; immunosuppression; pancytopenia

资金

  1. NIH
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background We hypothesized that the addition of sirolimus to standard horse antithymocyte globulin (h-ATG) and cyclosporine (CsA) would improve response rates in severe aplastic anemia, due to its complementary and synergistic properties to cyclosporine A. Design and Methods To test this hypothesis, we conducted a prospective randomized study comparing hATG/CsA/sirolimus to standard h-ATG/CsA. A total of 77 patients were treated from June 2003 to November 2005; 35 received h-ATG/CsA/sirolimus and 42 h-ATG/CsA. The two groups were well matched demographically and in blood counts prior to therapy. The primary end-point was hematologic response rate at 3 months. defined as no longer meeting the criteria for severe aplastic anemia. The study was powered to show a superior hematologic response rate of h-ATG/CsA/sirolimus compared to standard h-ATG/CsA. Results The overall response rate at 3 months was 37% for h-ATG/CsA/sirolimus and 50% for h-ATG/CsA and at 6 months 51% for h-ATG/CsA/sirolimus and 62% for h-ATG/CsA. After a planned interim analysis of 30 evaluable patients in each arm, accrual to the hATG/CsA/sirolimus arm was closed, as the conditional power for rejecting the null hypothesis was less than 1%. The rate of relapse, clonal evolution, and survival (secondary outcomes) did not differ significantly between patients treated with the two different regimens. Conclusions Despite a theoretical rationale for its use, sirolimus did not improve the response rate in patients with severe aplastic anemia when compared to standard h-ATG/CsA (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00061360).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据