4.6 Article

Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by FDG-PET/CT in patients with cervical cancer

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 120, 期 2, 页码 270-274

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.11.002

关键词

Cervical cancer; PET/CT; Metabolic tumor volume; Recurrence; Surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To determine if preoperative metabolic tumor volume (MTV) measured by integrated F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) imaging has prognostic value in patients with cervical cancer treated primarily with radical hysterectomy. Methods. Patients with FIGO stage IB to IIA cervical cancer were imaged with FDG-PET/CT before radical surgery. MTV was measured from attenuation-corrected FDG-PET/CT images using a standard uptake value (SUV)-based automated contouring program. We evaluated the relationship of MTV to disease-free survival (DFS). Results. A total of 63 patients were included in the study. The cut-off value for predicting recurrence was determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. MTV in this study was found to be correlated with ymph node (LN) metastasis, parametrium (PM) involvement, FIGO stage, and SUVmax. In univariate analysis, MTV >= 23.4 mL (HR 1.017, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.005-1.029, P=0.004), SUVmax >= 9.5 (HR 5.198, 95% Cl 1.076-25.118, P=0.04), LN metastasis (HR 12.338, 95% Cl 1.541-98.813, P=0.018), PM involvement (HR 14.274, 95% Cl 1.785-114.149, P=0.012), and lymphovascular space invasion (HR 8.871,95% Cl 1.104-71.261, P=0.04), were related to DFS. In multivariate analyses, age (HR 0.748, 95% Cl 0.587-0.952, P=0.018) and MTV >= 23.4 mL (HR 49.559, 95% Cl 1.257-1953.399, P=0.037) were determined to be independent prognostic factors of DFS. Conclusion. Preoperative MTV is an independent prognostic factor for DFS in patients with cervical cancer treated by radical surgery. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据