4.4 Article

Structural features for α-galactomannan binding to galectin-1

期刊

GLYCOBIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 543-551

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwr173

关键词

galactose; glycan; lectin; NMR; protein

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [NIH R01 CA096090]
  2. National Institutes of Health [NIH T32 CA009138]
  3. National Science Foundation [BIR-961477]
  4. University of Minnesota Medical School
  5. Minnesota Medical Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Galectins have a highly conserved carbohydrate-binding domain to which a variety of galactose-containing saccharides, both beta- and alpha-galactosides, can interact with varying degrees of affinity. Recently, we demonstrated that the relatively large alpha(1 -> 6)-d-galacto-beta(1 -> 4)-d-mannan (Davanat) binds galectin-1 (gal-1) primarily at an alternative carbohydrate-binding domain. Here, we used a series of alpha-galactomannans (GMs) that vary in their mannose-to-galactose ratios for insight into an optimal structural signature for GM binding to gal-1. Heteronuclear single-quantum coherence nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with N-15-labeled gal-1 and statistical modeling suggest that the optimal signature consists of alpha-d-galactopyranosyl doublets surrounded by regions of about four or more naked mannose residues. These relatively large and complex GMs all appear to interact with varying degrees at essentially the same binding surface on gal-1 that includes the Davanat alternative binding site and elements of the canonical beta-galactoside-binding region. The use of two small, well-defined GMs [6(1)-alpha(1 -> 6)-d-galactosyl-beta-d-mannotriaose and 6(3),6(4)-di-alpha(1 -> 6)-d-galactosyl-beta-d-mannopentaose] helped characterize how GMs, in general, interact in part with the canonical site. Overall, our findings contribute to better understanding interactions of gal-1 with larger, complex polysaccharides and to the development of GM-based therapeutics for clinical use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据