4.6 Article

Microglia in Normal Appearing White Matter of Multiple Sclerosis are Alerted but Immunosuppressed

期刊

GLIA
卷 61, 期 11, 页码 1848-1861

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/glia.22562

关键词

human microglia; multiple sclerosis; post-mortem tissue; flow cytometry; immune responses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little is known about the functional phenotype of microglia in normal appearing white matter (NAWM) of multiple sclerosis (MS), although it may hold valuable clues about mechanisms for lesion development. Therefore, we studied microglia from NAWM obtained post-mortem from controls (n=25) and MS patients (n=21) for their phenotype ex vivo and their immune responsiveness in vitro, using a microglia isolation method that omits culture and adherence. By flow cytometry, microglia in MS NAWM displayed elevated CD45 levels and increased size and granularity but were distinct from autologous choroid plexus macrophages by absent or low expression of additional markers, in particular CD206. Flow cytometric analysis of microglia from NAWM of three controls and four MS patients showed alterations in levels of Fc-gamma receptors in MS. In primary microglia from a bigger sample of subjects, analysis of Fc-gamma receptors by quantitative PCR indicated a significant increase in mRNA levels of the inhibitory CD32b isoform in MS NAWM. Despite their changed activation status, microglia from MS NAWM were unresponsive to lipopolysaccharide in vitro. Notably, culture with dexamethasone led to an impaired induction of the inflammation-limiting cytokine CCL18 in microglia from MS NAWM compared with those from control NAWM. Together, these data demonstrate that microglia in MS NAWM are in an alerted state, but display features of immunosuppression. Thus, the activation status of microglia in NAWM of MS patients likely reflects a response to ongoing neuroinflammation, which coincides with upregulation of immunoregulatory molecules to prevent full activation and damage to the vulnerable milieu. GLIA 2013;61:1848-1861

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据