4.6 Article

Two phases of replacement replenish the olfactory ensheathing cell population after injury in postnatal mice

期刊

GLIA
卷 60, 期 2, 页码 322-332

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/glia.22267

关键词

regeneration; migration; glia; axon; OEC

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [511006]
  2. National Centre for Adult Stem Cell Research from the Australian Government Department of Health and Aging
  3. Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) support the regeneration of olfactory sensory neurons throughout life, however, it remains unclear how OECs respond to a major injury. We have examined the proliferation and migration of OECs following unilateral bulbectomy in postnatal mice. S100 beta-DsRed and OMP-ZsGreen transgenic mice were used to visualize OECs and olfactory neurons, respectively, and we used the thymidine analogue ethynyl deoxyuridine (EdU) to identify cells that were proliferating at the time of administration. Following unilateral bulbectomy, there was an initial phase of OEC proliferation throughout the olfactory pathway with a peak of proliferation occurring 2 to 7 days after the injury. A second phase of proliferation also occurred in which precursors localized within the olfactory mucosa divided to replenish the OEC population. We then tracked the positions of OECs that had proliferated and found that there was a progressive increase in OECs in the cavity for at least 12 to 16 days after injury which could not be accounted for solely by local proliferation of OECs within the cavity. These results suggest that OECs migrated from the peripheral olfactory nerve to populate the mass of cells that filled cavity left by bulbectomy. Our results demonstrate that following injury to the olfactory nervous system, the OEC population is replenished by migration of cells that arise from both local proliferation of OECs throughout the olfactory nerve pathway as well as from precursor cells in the olfactory mucosa. (c) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据