4.3 Article

Using Beaver Works to Estimate Colony Activity in Boreal Landscapes

期刊

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
卷 79, 期 7, 页码 1072-1080

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.927

关键词

Castor canadensis; dam; marsh; meadow; pond; population; Voyageurs National Park

资金

  1. National Science Foundation grant [DEB-1349240]
  2. USDA Hatch Project [H505-14]
  3. Voyageurs National Park
  4. National Park Service Great Lakes Inventory and Monitoring Network
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1349240] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Beaver ponds and beaver-impounded vegetation are indicators of past or present beaver activity that can be detected from aerial photography. A method to quantitatively relate these beaver works with the density of active beaver colonies could benefit beaver management, particularly in areas lacking beaver population data. We compared historical maps (1961-2006) of beaver works at Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota, USA with concurrent aerial surveys of beaver colonies. We tested 2 landscape-scale models of beaver colony density previously developed for a period of beaver population expansion (1940-1986), but they failed to predict colony density after 1986, a period of declining beaver population. We developed a new landscape-scale regression, calculating that 2.15% of the landscape would be flooded by every 100 additional beaver colonies (R-2 = 0.53, P = 0.027). Classification tree analysis of individual pond sites showed that open water pond and impounded marsh area were the primary predictors of beaver colony presence or absence, but that the classification trees were far better at identifying inactive sites (>93% correct) than active sites (35-38% correct). The area of open water in beaver ponds is a good but not perfect indicator of beaver activity that can be used by wildlife managers as a landscape-scale indicator of beaver colony density. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据