4.3 Article

Roosting Habitat Use and Selection By Northern Spotted Owls During Natal Dispersal

期刊

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
卷 79, 期 2, 页码 254-262

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.834

关键词

dispersal habitat; logistic regression; northern spotted owl; radio-telemetry; Strix occidentalis caurina; Washington

资金

  1. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Regional Office and Pacific Northwest Research Station
  2. United States Department of Interior (USDI) Bureau of Land Management, Oregon State Office
  3. USDI United States Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon
  4. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied habitat selection by northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) during natal dispersal in Washington State, USA, at both the roost site and landscape scales. We used logistic regression to obtain parameters for an exponential resource selection function based on vegetation attributes in roost and random plots in 76 forest stands that were used for roosting. We used a similar analysis to evaluate selection of landscape habitat attributes based on 301 radio-telemetry relocations and random points within our study area. We found no evidence of within-stand selection for any of the variables examined, but 78% of roosts were in stands with at least some large (>50cmdbh) trees. At the landscape scale, owls selected for stands with high canopy cover (>70%). Dispersing owls selected vegetation types that were more similar to habitat selected by adult owls than habitat that would result from following guidelines previously proposed to maintain dispersal habitat. Our analysis indicates that juvenile owls select stands for roosting that have greater canopy cover than is recommended in current agency guidelines. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据