4.7 Article

The observed variation in cloud-induced longwave radiation in response to sea surface temperature over the Pacific warm pool from MTSAT-1R imagery

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012GL052700

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012-0000857]
  3. Korea Minister of Environment as The Eco-technopia 21 project
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [과06A1402, 2009-0093458, 2009-0093464] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated variations in outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) in response to changes in sea surface temperature (SST) over the Pacific warm pool area (20 degrees N-20 degrees S, 130 degrees E-170 degrees W). OLR values were obtained from recent (January 2008-June 2010) geostationary window channel imagery at hourly resolution, which resolves processes associated with tropical convective clouds. We used linear regression analysis with the domain-averaged OLR and SST anomalies (i.e., Delta OLR, Delta SST; deviations from their 90-day moving averages). Results show that the regression slope appears to be significant only with SST least-affected by cloud radiative forcing, for which SST needs to be obtained as daily average over cloud-free regions (Delta SSTclear). The estimated value of Delta OLR/Delta SSTclear is 15.72 W m(-2) K-1, indicating the presence of strong outgoing longwave radiation in response to surface warming. This atmospheric cooling effect is found to be primarily associated with reduced areal coverage of clouds (-14.4% K-1). Citation: Cho, H., C.-H. Ho, and Y.-S. Choi (2012), The observed variation in cloud-induced longwave radiation in response to sea surface temperature over the Pacific warm pool from MTSAT-1R imagery, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L18802, doi:10.1029/2012GL052700.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据