4.7 Article

Io: Charting thermal emission variability with the Galileo NIMS Io Thermal Emission Database (NITED): Loki Patera

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011GL049999

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA
  2. NASA OPR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have calculated the approximate to 5-mu m radiant flux for every volcanic hot spot in every one of the 190 Galileo Near-Infrared Mapping Spectrometer (NIMS) tube observations of Io obtained between 28 June 1996 and 16 October 2001 in order to determine the variability of thermal emission from Io's volcanoes at local, regional and global scales, and to identify individual eruption episodes where thermal emission waxes and wanes. The resulting NIMS Io Thermal Emission Database (NITED) allows the comparison of activity at individual volcanoes and different regions of Io. The database contains over 1000 measurements of radiant flux at approximately 5 mu m, corrected for emission angle, range to target and incident sunlight (where necessary). We examine the data for Loki Patera, Io's most powerful volcano. For data acquired in local darkness we use two-temperature fits to nighttime spectra and prior knowledge of emitting area to determine total radiated thermal emission. For other data we use the constancy of the integrated thermal emission spectrum to determine total thermal emission from measurements of radiant flux at 5 mu m. As seen by NIMS, total thermal emission from Loki Patera varies between 7600 GW and 17000 GW. We revise upwards previous estimates of thermal emission from NIMS data. NIMS 3.5-mu m radiant fluxes (both measured and estimated) are consistent with measurements from ground-based telescopes. This work highlights the value of NITED as a research tool. Citation: Davies, A. G., G. J. Veeder, D. L. Matson, and T. V. Johnson (2012), Io: Charting thermal emission variability with the Galileo NIMS Io Thermal Emission Database (NITED): Loki Patera, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L01201, doi:10.1029/2011GL049999.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据