4.6 Article

Automated object-based classification of topography from SRTM data

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 21-33

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.12.001

关键词

Landform classification; Terrain segmentation; Object-based image analysis (OBIA); Local variance; Complexity; Web application

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [FWF-P20777-N15]
  2. EC [FP7-PEOPLE-ERG-2008-239312]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce an object-based method to automatically classify topography from SRTM data. The new method relies on the concept of decomposing land-surface complexity into more homogeneous domains. An elevation layer is automatically segmented and classified at three scale levels that represent domains of complexity by using self-adaptive, data-driven techniques. For each domain, scales in the data are detected with the help of local variance and segmentation is performed at these appropriate scales. Objects resulting from segmentation are partitioned into sub-domains based on thresholds given by the mean values of elevation and standard deviation of elevation respectively. Results resemble reasonably patterns of existing global and regional classifications, displaying a level of detail close to manually drawn maps. Statistical evaluation indicates that most of classes satisfy the regionalization requirements of maximizing internal homogeneity while minimizing external homogeneity. Most objects have boundaries matching natural discontinuities at regional level. The method is simple and fully automated. The input data consist of only one layer, which does not need any pre-processing. Both segmentation and classification rely on only two parameters: elevation and standard deviation of elevation. The methodology is implemented as a customized process for the eCognition (R) software, available as online download. The results are embedded in a web application with functionalities of visualization and download. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据