4.3 Article

Belgian substages as a basis for an international chronostratigraphic division of the Tournaisian and Visean

期刊

GEOLOGICAL MAGAZINE
卷 151, 期 2, 页码 229-243

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0016756813000587

关键词

Mississippian; Belgium; stratigraphy; stage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Tournaisian and Visean were formerly considered as series and in Belgium were divided into two (Hastarian and Ivorian) and three stages (Moliniacian, Livian and Warnantian), which are now considered as substages. The Belgian substages are based on conodonts and foraminifers, and incidentally on rugose corals, and are described here. Their boundaries, biostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy are well detailed and clearly defined. The base of the Hastarian (lower Tournaisian) corresponds to the base of the Tournaisian (base of Carboniferous); the base of the Ivorian (upper Tournaisian) corresponds to the appearance of the conodont Polygnathus communis carina, a little above the last Siphonodella; the base of the Moliniacian (lower Visean) corresponds to the base of the Visean stage defined by the first occurrence of the foraminifer Eoparastaffella simplex; the Livian (middle Visean) corresponds to the foraminiferal MFZ12 Zone and is marked by the appearance of Koskinotextularia and Pojarkovella nibelis; the base of the Warnantian (upper Visean) is marked by the appearance of Neoarchaediscus, Vissariotaxis, Planospirodiscus, and Palaeotextularia with a bilaminar wall, the index taxa of the MFZ13-Neoarchaediscus Zone. The up-to-date chronostratigraphic subdivision of the Tournaisian and Visean is not limited to Belgium and the surrounding areas. It can be applied through Eurasia as far as South China. The Belgian units could therefore be the basis for a future international division of the Tournaisian into two parts (Hastarian and Ivorian) and of the Visean into three parts (Moliniacian, Livian and Warnantian), corresponding to time intervals of c. 5-8 Ma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据