4.5 Article

Rayleigh wave phase velocities in the Atlantic upper mantle

期刊

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 4305-4324

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014GC005518

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [0838180]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Division Of Earth Sciences [0838180] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phase velocity in the period range 30-130 s is measured for approximately 10,000 fundamental-mode Rayleigh waves traversing the Atlantic basin. In order to isolate the signal of the oceanic upper mantle, paths with >30% of their length through continental upper mantle are excluded. The lateral distribution of Rayleigh wave phase velocity in the Atlantic upper mantle is explored with two approaches. One, phase velocity is allowed to vary only as a function of seafloor age. Two, a general two-dimensional parameterization is utilized in order to capture perturbations to age-dependent structure. In both scenarios, phase velocity shows a strong dependence on seafloor age at all periods, with higher velocity associated with older seafloor. Removing age-dependent velocity from the 2-D phase-velocity maps highlights areas of anomalously low velocity, almost all of which are proximal to locations of hotspot volcanism. The age-dependent phase velocities for the Atlantic are not consistent with a half-space cooling model and are best explained by a plate cooling model with thickness of 75 km and mantle temperature of 1400 degrees C. In contrast, age-dependent phase velocities for the Pacific basin determined by Nishimura and Forsyth (1989) can be fit reasonably well by a half-space cooling model with mantle temperature approximately 50 degrees C warmer than the Atlantic. Comparison of Rayleigh wave phase velocity and fractionation-corrected Na concentrations in mid-ocean ridge basalts erupted at 87 axial ridge segments reveals a positive correlation coefficient that increases with period, as expected if along-ridge variations in mantle potential temperature are controlling both quantities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据