4.5 Article

Annual variation of coastal uplift in Greenland as an indicator of variable and accelerating ice mass loss

期刊

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 1569-1589

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/ggge.20089

关键词

Greenland's ice sheet; GPS vertical displacement; seasonal melting; climatic forcings

资金

  1. NASA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Key Points Seasonal melting of Greenland ice sheet is investigated using GPS data Significant melting of Greenland's ice sheet in 2010 is observed Roles of ocean versus atmospheric forcing on coastal melting are investigated Seasonal melting of the coastal part of the Greenland ice sheet is investigated using GPS vertical displacement data from coastal stations, combined with data on atmospheric and ocean temperatures. Using a high pass filter and cubic spline models, we estimate five variables describing seasonal uplift, a proxy for proximal mass loss, including duration of the melt season and the amount of summer uplift. Our analysis shows both temporal and spatial variations of uplift. Southern coastal Greenland experienced anomalously large uplift in summer 2010, implying significant melting that year. However, the northwest coast did not experience significant change in uplift at that time. Our data suggest that a combination of warm summer air temperature and warm sub-surface ocean water temperature drove the large mass losses in 2010. Using the uplift pattern of 2008-2010, and comparing to atmospheric data and ocean water temperature data, we show that warm Irminger Water (IW) exerted significant influence on coastal melting in southeastern, southern and southwestern Greenland, reaching about 69 degrees N in 2010. North of this, IW did not exert significant influence, in effect defining the northward limit of the sub-polar gyre for that year. Thus, short-term variability in the coastal GPS uplift signal can be used to infer an oceanographic parameter that has a critical influence on Greenland ice sheet health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据