4.4 Article

From microbial eukaryotes to metazoan vertebrates: Wide spectrum paleo-diversity in sedimentary ancient DNA over the last ∼14,500years

期刊

GEOBIOLOGY
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 628-639

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gbi.12307

关键词

18S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing; paleoenvironment; paleome species richness

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund through the Centre of Excellence in Chemical Biology
  2. Biotieteiden ja Ympariston Tutkimuksen Toimikunta
  3. Eesti Teadusagentuur [IUT1-8, IUT21-2, PUT134, PUT1389]
  4. EBOR project, Academy of Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most studies that utilize ancient DNA have focused on specific groups of organisms or even single species. Instead, the whole biodiversity of eukaryotes can be described using universal phylogenetic marker genes found within well-preserved sediment cores that cover the post-glacial period. Sedimentary ancient DNA samples from Lake Lielais Svetinu, eastern Latvia, at a core depth of 1,050cm in similar to 150year intervals were used to determine phylotaxonomy in domain Eukaryota. Phylotaxonomic affiliation of >1,200 eukaryotic phylotypes revealed high richness in all major eukaryotic groupsAlveolata, Stramenopiles, Cercozoa, Chlorophyta, Charophyta, Nucletmycea, and Holozoa. The share of organisms that originate from terrestrial ecosystems was about one third, of which the most abundant molecular operational taxonomic units were Fungi and tracheal/vascular plants, which demonstrates the usefulness of using lake sediments to reconstruct the terrestrial paleoecosystems that surround them. Phylotypes that originate from the lake ecosystem belonged to various planktonic organisms; phyto-, proto,- and macrozooplankton, and vascular aquatic plants. We observed greater richness of several planktonic organisms that can be associated with higher trophic status during the warm climate period between 4,000 and 8,000years ago and an increase in eukaryotic richness possibly associated with moderate human impact over the last 2,000years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据