4.5 Article

Expression Level Drives the Pattern of Selective Constraints along the Insulin/Tor Signal Transduction Pathway in Caenorhabditis

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 715-722

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evr071

关键词

network; aging; molecular evolution; gene expression; selection

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0710378]
  2. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
  3. National Institutes of Health [R03-AG029377, P01-AG022500]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R03AG029377, P01AG022500] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genes do not act in isolation but perform their biological functions within genetic pathways that are connected in larger networks. Investigation of nucleotide variation within genetic pathways and networks has shown that topology can affect the rate of protein evolution; however, it remains unclear whether a same pattern of nucleotide variation is expected within functionally similar networks and whether it may be due to similar or different biological mechanisms. We address these questions by investigating nucleotide variation in the context of the structure of the insulin/Tor-signaling pathway in Caenorhabditis, which is well characterized and is functionally conserved across phylogeny. In Drosophila and vertebrates, the rate of protein evolution is negatively correlated with the position of a gene within the insulin/Tor pathway. Similarly, we find that in Caenorhabditis, the rate of amino acid replacement is lower for downstream genes. However, in Caenorhabditis, the rate of synonymous substitution is also strongly affected by the position of a gene in the pathway, and we show that the distribution of selective pressure along the pathway is driven by differential expression level. A full understanding of the effect of pathway structure on selective constraints is therefore likely to require inclusion of specific biological function into more general network models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据