4.1 Article

Phenotypic and molecular characterization of CTX-M-14 extended-spectrum β-lactamase and plasmid-mediated ACT-like AmpC β-lactamase produced by Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from chickens in Henan Province, China

期刊

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 3357-3364

出版社

FUNPEC-EDITORA
DOI: 10.4238/2012.September.24.1

关键词

Klebsiella pneumoniae; AmpC beta-lactamase; Genotype; Extended spectrum beta-lactamases

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30771624]
  2. Key Laboratory for Animal-Derived Food Safety of Henan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and AmpC beta-lactamases produced by a clinical isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae from chickens were detected with confirmatory phenotypic tests of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of 18 antibacterial drugs against K. pneumoniae were determined by the 2-fold microdilution method. The genotype and subtype of the ESBL-producing and AmpC beta-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae isolate were identified by PCR amplification of the enzyme-encoding genes followed by DNA sequencing analysis. K. pneumoniae K-1 isolate was an ESBL-producing and AmpC beta-lactamase-producing bacteria with high resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, such as penicillins, third-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides. The sequence analysis showed that K. pneumoniae K-1 harbored TEM-type, SHV-type, CTX-M-type, and ACT-type AmpC beta-lactamase nucleotide sequences. The TEM-type sequence was designated as TEM-1; the SHV-type sequence was designated as SHV-11; the CTX-M-type sequence was designated as CTX-M-14. Compared with the ACT-like sequence (EF078894), the ACT-type sequence was characterized by 8 nucleotide mutations (A(75)G, C(84)G, (TC)-C-90, A(105)G, G(213)A, G(246)A, (CT)-T-309, and (TC)-C-315). Only one mutation at position 75 led to an amino acid substitution (Asn28Lys). The bla(ACT) type was an ACT-like derivative.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据