4.4 Article

Multiple Pathways of Duplication Formation with and Without Recombination (RecA) in Salmonella enterica

期刊

GENETICS
卷 192, 期 2, 页码 397-415

出版社

GENETICS SOC AM
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.142570

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM27068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Duplications are often attributed to unequal recombination between separated, directly repeated sequence elements (>100 bp), events that leave a recombinant element at the duplication junction. However, in the bacterial chromosome, duplications form at high rates (10(-3)-10(-5)/cell/division) even without recombination (RecA). Here we describe 1800 spontaneous lac duplications trapped nonselectively on the low-copy F'(128) plasmid, where lac is flanked by direct repeats of the transposable element IS3 (1258 bp) and by numerous quasipalindromic REP elements (30 bp). Duplications form at a high rate (10(-4)/cell/division) that is reduced only about 11-fold in the absence of RecA. With and without RecA, most duplications arise by recombination between IS3 elements (97%). Formation of these duplications is stimulated by IS3 transposase (Tnp) and plasmid transfer functions (TraI). Three duplication pathways are proposed. First, plasmid dimers form at a high rate stimulated by RecA and are then modified by deletions between IS3 elements (resolution) that leave a monomeric plasmid with an IS3-flanked lac duplication. Second, without RecA, duplications occur by single-strand annealing of DNA ends generated in different sister chromosomes after transposase nicks DNA near participating IS3 elements. The absence of RecA may stimulate annealing by allowing chromosome breaks to persist. Third, a minority of lac duplications (3%) have short (0-36 bp) junction sequences (SJ), some of which are located within REP elements. These duplication types form without RecA, Tnp, or Tra by a pathway in which the palindromic junctions of a tandem inversion duplication (TID) may stimulate deletions that leave the final duplication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据