4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Analysis of Multiple Phenotypes

期刊

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 S33-S39

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20470

关键词

multivariate analyses; quantitative traits; longitudinal data; instrumental variables; association analysis; genetic risk scores; data reduction; correlation

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM031575, R01 GM031575-28] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH059490, R01 MH059490-03] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM031575] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH059490] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The complex etiology of common diseases like cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, and rheumatoid arthritis has led investigators to focus on the genetics of correlated phenotypes and risk factors. joint analysis of multiple disease-related phenotypes may reveal genes of pleiotropic effect and increase analytical power, but at the cost of increased analytical and computational complexity. All three data sets provided for analysis at the Genetic Analysis Workshop 16 offered multiple quantitative measures of phenotypes related to underlying disease processes as well as discrete measures of affection status. Participants in Group 6 addressed the challenges and possibilities of association analysis of these data sets on multiple levels, including phenotype definition and data reduction, multivariate approaches to gene discovery, analysis of causality and data structure, and development of predictive models. These approaches included combinations of continuous and discrete phenotypes, use of repeated measures in longitudinal data, and models that included multiple phenotypic measures and multiple single-nucleotide polymorphism variants. Most research teams regarded the use of multiple related phenotypes as a tool for increasing analytical power, as well as for clarifying the underlying biology of complex diseases. Genet. Epidetniol. 33 (Suppl. 1):S33-S39, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据