4.0 Article

Ectoderm, Endoderm, and the Evolution of Heterodont Dentitions

期刊

GENESIS
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 382-389

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/dvg.20634

关键词

tooth development; evolution; endoderm

资金

  1. Les Gueules Cassees
  2. Club Mollin France
  3. MRC
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22592061] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mammalian dentitions consist of different shapes/types of teeth that are positioned in different regions of the jaw (heterodont) whereas in many fish and reptiles all teeth are of similar type (homodont). The process by which heterodont dentitions have evolved in mammals is not understood. In many teleosts teeth develop in the pharynx from endoderm (endodermal teeth), whereas mammalian teeth develop from the oral ectoderm indicating that teeth can develop (and thus possibly evolve) via different mechanisms. In this article, we compare the molecular characteristics of pharyngeal/foregut endoderm with the molecular characteristics of oral ectoderm during mouse development. The expression domains of Claudin6, Hnf3 beta, alpha-fetoprotein, Rbm35a, and Sox2 in the embryonic endoderm have boundaries overlapping the molar tooth-forming region, but not the incisor region in the oral ectoderm. These results suggest that molar teeth (but not incisors) develop from epithelium that shares molecular characteristics with pharyngeal endoderm. This opens the possibility that the two different theories proposed for the evolution of teeth may both be correct. Multicuspid (eg. molars) having evolved from the externalization of endodermal teeth into the oral cavity and monocuspid (eg. incisors) having evolved from internalization of ectodermal armour odontodes of ancient fishes. The two different mechanisms of tooth development may have provided the developmental and genetic diversity on which evolution has acted to produce heterodont dentitions in mammals. genesis 48:382-389, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据