4.1 Article

Behavioral analyses of mutants for two odorant-binding protein genes, Obp57d and Obp57e, in Drosophila melanogaster

期刊

GENES & GENETIC SYSTEMS
卷 83, 期 3, 页码 257-264

出版社

GENETICS SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1266/ggs.83.257

关键词

taste and odor perception; oviposition-site preference; feeding behavior

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [19770210]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19770210] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The odorant-binding protein (OBP) functions in chemosensation in insects. Two OBP genes, Obp57d and Obp57e, are involved in the evolution of the unique hostplant preference in Drosophila sechellia. Comparative analysis of the Obp57dle genomic sequences in the Drosophila melanogaster species group has revealed that the rapid evolution of Obp57d and Obp57e has resulted in functional divergence between the two genes. Here, using D. melanogaster knockout strains generated by gene targeting, we examined the roles of Obp57d and Obp57e in behavioral response to a series of fatty acids. In the taste-based oviposition-site preference assay, the knockout flies showed stronger preference for acids than wild-type flies, indicating that the normal functions of Obp57d and Obp57e are associated with the suppression of positive preference for C-6-C-9 acids. Heterozygotes for each knockout haplotype also exhibited a significantly different behavioral response compared with wild-type flies, suggesting that Obp57d and Obp57e have a gene dosage effect on behavior. In contrast, the wild-type and knockout flies exhibited similar responses in the feeding assay and the odor-based free-walking assay, suggesting that the two OBPs' contribution to feeding and olfactory behaviors is small. Taken together, our results demonstrated that each of Obp57d and Obp57e in D. melanogaster contributes to the determination of reproductive sites, suggesting that the two OBP genes play an important role in ecological adaptation of Drosophila.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据