4.7 Article

Recruitment of sphingosine kinase to presynaptic terminals by a conserved muscarinic signaling pathway promotes neurotransmitter release

期刊

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
卷 26, 期 10, 页码 1070-1085

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.188003.112

关键词

sphingosine kinase; mAChR; heterotrimeric G protein; Trio RhoGEF; synapse; C. elegans

资金

  1. American Heart Association
  2. NIH NINDS [NS071085-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sphingolipids are potent lipid second messengers that regulate cell differentiation, migration, survival, and secretion, and alterations in sphingolipid signaling have been implicated in a variety of diseases. However, how sphingolipid levels are regulated, particularly in the nervous system, remains poorly understood. Here, we show that the generation of sphingosine-1-phosphate by sphingosine kinase (SphK) promotes neurotransmitter release. Electrophysiological, imaging, and behavioral analyses of Caenorhabditis elegans mutants lacking sphingosine kinase sphk-1 indicate that neuronal development is normal, but there is a significant defect in neurotransmitter release from neuromuscular junctions. SPHK-1 localizes to discrete, nonvesicular regions within presynaptic terminals, and this localization is critical for synaptic function. Muscarinic agonists cause a rapid increase in presynaptic SPHK-1 abundance, whereas reduction of endogenous acetylcholine production results in a rapid decrease in presynaptic SPHK-1 abundance. Muscarinic regulation of presynaptic SPHK-1 abundance is mediated by a conserved presynaptic signaling pathway composed of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor GAR-3, the heterotrimeric G protein G alpha q, and its effector, Trio RhoGEF. SPHK-1 activity is required for the effects of muscarinic signaling on synaptic transmission. This study shows that SPHK-1 promotes neurotransmitter release in vivo and identifies a novel muscarinic pathway that regulates SphK abundance at presynaptic terminals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据