4.6 Article

How effective are the sustainability criteria accompanying the European Union 2020 biofuel targets?

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 306-314

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01188.x

关键词

biodiversity; biofuels; GHG emissions; land use change; modelling; Renewable Energy Directive; sustainability criteria

资金

  1. BIOMASS FUTURES project by the European Union's Intelligent Energy Programme [IEE 08 653 SI2. 529 241]
  2. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) [244766]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expansion of biofuel production can lead to an array of negative environmental impacts. Therefore, the European Union (EU) has recently imposed sustainability criteria on biofuel production in the Renewable Energy Directive (RED). In this article, we analyse the effectiveness of the sustainability criteria for climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation. We first use a global agriculture and forestry model to investigate environmental effects of the EU member states National Renewable Energy Action Plans (NREAPs) without sustainability criteria. We conclude that these targets would drive losses of 2.2Mha of highly biodiverse areas and generate 95MtCO 2 eq of additional greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, in a second step, we demonstrate that the EU biofuel demand could be satisfied sustainably' according to RED despite its negative environmental effects. This is because the majority of global crop production is produced sustainably' in the sense of RED and can provide more than 10 times the total European biofuel demand in 2020 if reallocated from sectors without sustainability criteria. This finding points to a potential policy failure of applying sustainability regulation to a single sector in a single region. To be effective this policy needs to be more complete in targeting a wider scope of agricultural commodities and more comprehensive in its membership of countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据