4.7 Article

Feasibility of gastric electrical stimulation by percutaneous endoscopic transgastric electrodes

期刊

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
卷 68, 期 4, 页码 754-759

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.060

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Gastric electrical simulation has been used for the treatment of drug refactory GI motility disorders and for the treatment of obesity. Both these indications have involved sugical placement of gastric electrodes, which adds to the complexity and cost of the procedure. Endoscopic placement is therefore an attractive alternative approach for this therapy. Objective: Our purpose was to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic electrodes for gastric electrical stimulation. Design and Setting: Experimental animal study in hound dogs. Interventions: Percutaneous endoscopic transgastric electorde (PETE) placement was carried out by using a pair of gastric pacing wires attached to a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube. In addition, 4 pairs of gastric serosal electrodes were implanted surgically for comparison. The efficacy of the percutaneous endoscopic electrodes was defined by their ability to entrain gastric slow waves and the induction of dysrhythmia. Results: (1) The PETE recorded gastric slow waves comparableto the serosal electrodes. (2) Gastric electrical stimulation with long pulses delivered by the PETE, at a frequency of 10% higher than the intrinsci gastric slow wave frequency, entrained gastric slow waves. (3) Gastric electrical stimulation delivered by the PETE, at a tachy-gastric frequency, included gastric dysrhythmia. Limitations: This was an animal study; however, its results are expected to be reproducible in humans, with PETE kept in place for even a longer duration than 6 to 8 weeks. Conclusions: PETE placement is both feasible and safe. PETEs are effective, having a potential for use in treatment of both gastroparesis and obesity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据