4.8 Article

PXR Prevents Cholesterol Gallstone Disease by Regulating Biosynthesis and Transport of Bile Salts

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 140, 期 7, 页码 2095-2106

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.055

关键词

Fgf15; PCN; Nuclear Receptor; Gene Regulation; Transgenic Mice

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK083952, ES014626]
  2. American Heart Association [09POST2280546]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cholesterol gallstone disease (CGD) results from a biochemical imbalance of lipids and bile salts in the gallbladder bile. We investigated whether the xenobiotic receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) has a role in pathogenesis of CGD. METHODS: Wild-type, PXR-null (PXR(-/-)), and CGD-sensitive C57L mice were placed on a lithogenic diet and then analyzed for CGD at the biochemical, histological, and gene-regulation levels. RESULTS: Loss of PXR sensitized mice to lithogenic diet-induced CGD, characterized by decreases in biliary concentrations of bile salts and phospholipids and an increases in the cholesterol saturation index and formation of cholesterol crystals. The decreased bile acid pool size in PXR(-/-) mice that received lithogenic diets was associated with reduced expression of cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme of cholesterol catabolism and bile acid formation. The reduced expression of cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase most likely resulted from activation of farnesoid X receptor and induction of fibroblast growth factor 15 in the intestine. In C57L mice given the PXR agonist, pregnenolone-16 alpha-carbonitrile, or the herbal medicine, St John's wort, cholesterol precipitation was prevented by increases in concentrations of biliary bile salt and a reduced cholesterol saturation index. PXR prevented CGD via its coordinate regulation of the biosynthesis and transport of bile salts in the liver and intestine. CONCLUSIONS: PXR maintains biliary bile acid homeostasis and may be developed as a therapeutic target for CGD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据