4.8 Article

Regional Brain Activity in Functional Dyspepsia: A H215O-PET Study on the Role of Gastric Sensitivity and Abuse History

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 139, 期 1, 页码 36-47

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.04.015

关键词

Functional Dyspepsia; Gastric Hypersensitivity; Abuse; Brain

资金

  1. Methusalem
  2. FWO-Vlaanderen (Research Foundation-Flanders)
  3. Federaal Wetenschapsbeleid belspo IUAP [P6/29]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Differences in brain activity between health and functional dyspepsia (FD) have been reported; it is unclear whether this is influenced by gastric hypersensitivity or abuse history. Therefore, we aimed to determine the influence of gastric sensitivity and abuse history on gastric sensation scores and brain activity in homeostatic-afferent, emotional-arousal, and cortical-modulatory brain regions in FD. METHODS: Abuse history was assessed using a validated self-report questionnaire. H(2)(15)O positron emission tomography was performed in 25 FD patients (13 hypersensitive and 8 abused) during 3 conditions, that is, no distension, gastric distension at discomfort threshold, and sham distension. Data were analyzed in SPM2. Region of interest analysis was used to confirm differences in prehypothesized regions. RESULTS: No association between hypersensitivity and abuse history was found. Gastric hypersensitivity was associated with significantly higher gastric sensation scores during baseline and sham. A condition-independent difference in ventral posterior cingulate activity was found between groups, as well as distension and sham-specific differences in brainstem and cingulate areas. Abuse history was associated with higher gastric sensation scores in all conditions and with differences in insular, prefrontal, and hippocampus/amygdala activity. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric sensitivity and abuse history independently influence gastric sensation as well as brain activity in FD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据