4.5 Article

Quantification of inertial sensor-based 3D joint angle measurement accuracy using an instrumented gimbal

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 320-323

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.05.018

关键词

3D knee kinematics; Joint coordinate system; Instrumented gimbal; Inertial sensor accuracy; Knee joint angles

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. NSERC USRA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study quantified the accuracy of inertial sensors in 3D anatomical joint angle measurement with respect to an instrumented gimbal. The gimbal rotated about three axes and directly measured the angles in the ISB recommended knee joint coordinate system. Through the use of sensor attachment devices physically fixed to the gimbal, the joint angle estimation error due to sensor attachment (the inaccuracy of the sensor attachment matrix) was essentially eliminated, leaving only error due to the inertial sensors. The angle estimation error (RMSE) corresponding to the sensor was found to be 3.20 degrees in flexion/extension, 3.42 degrees in abduction/adduction and 2.88 degrees in internal/external rotation. Bland-Altman means of maximum absolute value were -1.63 degrees inflexion/extension, 3.22 degrees in abduction/adduction and -2.61 degrees in internal/external rotation. The magnitude of the errors reported in this study imply that even under ideal conditions irreproducible in human gait studies, inertial angle measurement will be subject to errors of a few degrees. Conversely, the reported errors are smaller than those reported previously in human gait studies, which suggest that the sensor attachment is also significant source of error in inertial gait measurement. The proposed apparatus and methodology could be used to quantify the performance of different sensor systems and orientation estimation algorithms, and to verify experimental protocols before human experimentation. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据