4.5 Article

The effect of lower extremity selective voluntary motor control on interjoint coordination during gait in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 102-107

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.07.007

关键词

Cerebral palsy; Gait; Interjoint coordination; Selective motor control; Relative phase analysis

资金

  1. Lena Longo Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Damage to motor tracts in the periventricular white matter is a primary etiology in spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP). These tracts are responsible for the production of selective voluntary motor control (SVMC). Lower extremity motor control has been suggested as being an important predictor of improvement following interventions. While there are multiple impairments in spastic CP, the inability to perform purposeful voluntary movement is a critical factor in determining functional ability that merits investigation. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between SVMC ability and hip and knee coordination during the swing phase of gait in participants with spastic CP. Gait analysis and SVMC assessments were conducted for 15 participants with CP. Relative phase analysis was used to calculate the minimum relative phase (MRP) angle during swing; a measurement of interjoint coordination between the hip and the knee. SVMC ability was measured using the Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE) tool. Significant correlations were found between SCALE scores and both MRP values (p < 0.0001) and duration of out-of-phase movement (p < 0.005) during swing. These findings supported our hypothesis that SVMC ability is related to a patient's ability to move in an uncoupled pattern during the swing phase of gait (i.e., extending the knee while flexing the hip). An understanding of influence of SVMC on swing phase gait mechanics may help establish appropriate goals for interventions, in particular hamstring lengthenings. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据