4.6 Article

The genus Phylloporus (Boletaceae, Boletales) from China: morphological and multilocus DNA sequence analyses

期刊

FUNGAL DIVERSITY
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 73-101

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13225-012-0184-7

关键词

Biogeography; Newtaxa; Phylogenetic species; Species diversity; Taxonomy

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U0836604]
  2. Yunnan Provincial Government [U0836604]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB522300]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2008FY110300-03-1]
  6. State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China [201207002-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Species of the genus Phylloporus in China were investigated based on morphology and molecular phylogenetic analysis of a three-locus (nrLSU, ITS and tef-1a) DNA sequence dataset. Twenty-one phylogenetic species were recognized among the studied collections. Seven of them are described as new: P. brunneiceps, P. imbricatus, P. maculatus, P. pachycystidiatus, P. rubeolus, P. rubrosquamosus, and P. yunnanensis. In addition, four of them correspond with the previous morphology-based taxa: P. bellus, P. luxiensis, P. parvisporus, and P. rufescens. The remaining ten phylogenetic species were not described due to the paucity of the materials. A key to the Chinese morphologically recognizable taxa was provided. A preliminary biogeographical analysis showed that (1) Pylloporus species in East Asia and Southeast Asia are mostly closely related, (2) species pairs or closely related species of Phylloporus between East Asia and North/Central America are relatively common, and (3) the biogeographic relationship of Phylloporus between East Asia and Europe was supported by only a single species pair. Unexpectedly, no taxa common either to both Europe and East Asia, or to both East Asia and North/Central America, were uncovered. Clades look to have taxa from both sides of the Pacific and Europe/Asia though.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据