4.3 Article

Morphology and molecular taxonomy of Evlachovaea-like fungi, and the status of this unusual conidial genus

期刊

FUNGAL BIOLOGY
卷 117, 期 1, 页码 1-12

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2012.10.001

关键词

1F=1N; Cordyceps; Isaria; Paecilomyces; Phylogenetics; South America

类别

资金

  1. National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of High Education Personnel (CAPES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The entomopathogenic anamorphic genus Evlachovaea was described to differ from other fungi in forming its conidia obliquely to the axis of the conidiogenous cell and with successive conidia having alternate orientations with a zipper- or chevron-like arrangement resulting in flat, ribbon-like chains. Morphological and molecular studies of six Evlachovaea-like isolates baited from Central Brazilian soils using Triatoma infestans (a vector of Chagas disease) and of other entomopathogens with Evlachovaea-like conidiogenesis led to a re-evaluation of the status of this little known fungal genus. The Brazilian isolates formed two distinct groups based on gene sequences for both the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and translation elongation factor (EF-1 alpha) genes, morphology, and growth patterns; both groups also differed from the type species, Evlachovaea kintrischica. More detailed studies of these fungi indicated that the altematingly oblique orientations of forming conidia are neither a stable nor invariant character (even on single phialides). Furthermore, the molecular cladistic analysis unambiguously placed the Eulachovaea isolates firmly within the genus Isaria (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae). The ITS sequences of E. kintrischica were very similar or even identical to those of Isaria amoenerosea and Isaria cateniobliqua, thereby suggesting that E. kintrischica is a synonym of one of these species, and that the genus Eulachovaea must be treated as a later synonym of Isaria, which must now be recognized to include several highly divergent modes of conidiogenesis. These taxonomic findings are discussed in the context of dramatic changes recently imposed on the nomen-clatural standards used to determine the correct names of all pleomorphic fungi. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Mycological Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据